niche

Common Sense Suggestions for handbooks, evaluating performance and complying with HR regulations

Practical Manager Training for recruiting, coaching and developing top performers

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Who's Got A Ticket To Ride? New Commuting Legislation For 50+ Employers

The new Bay Area Commuter Benefits Program requires employers with 50 or more full-time employees in the Bay Area (included counties listed below) to offer commuter benefits to their employees. Employers subject to the program must select a commuter benefit, register via the program website and implement their program by September 30, 2014.

The Bay Area Commuter Benefits Program requires these employers to offer one or more of the following commuter benefit options to their employees:

·      Option 1: Pre-Tax Benefit - Allow employees to exclude up to $130 of their transit or vanpooling expenses each month from taxable income.

·      Option 2: Employer-Provided Subsidy - Provide a subsidy to reduce or cover employees’ monthly transit or vanpool costs, up to $75 per month.

·      Option 3: Employer-Provided Transit - Provide a free or low-cost transit service for employees, such as a bus, shuttle or vanpool service.

·      Option 4: Alternative Commuter Benefit - Provide an alternative commuter benefit that is as effective in reducing single-occupancy commute trips as Options 1, 2 or 3.

Failure to comply may incur a financial penalty—amount determined on a case-by-case basis. Although the agency won’t be able to audit everyone, remember that employees who don’t get this benefit will be able to seek remedies at 511.org.

Employers can visit 511.org and click on Bay Area Commuter Benefits Program for program information and employer outreach staff assistance or call 511 and say “Commuter Benefits” at the first prompt to help employers get started or contact Judy Pearce, 650-518-0327.


*Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano and Sonoma


Tuesday, April 1, 2014

When You Get Rid Of All Manager Roles, Are You Left With A Popularity Contest?


Zappos—a nationwide retailer— adopted a new organizational structure that eliminates traditional managers, does away with the typical corporate hierarchy and gets rid of job titles. (See Washington Post @ Zappos Article) Could this end up being just like a high school popularity poll?

Please think about that for a minute. What will happen to the traditional manager’s job of terminating poor performers? At Zappos that responsibility is turned over to a group of employees. Their committee is charged with “monitoring the company's culture” to decide when performers are not a “good fit” — and then terminating those the committee deems as culturally unfit.

Who is going to stand up for the over 40 crowd who may not possess the youthful attributes of cultural fit?  And who is going to stop sexual harassment? Historically as well as today groups of employees don’t self-monitor all that well in preventing hostile environments. (Think Miami Dolphins bullying episodes.)

There’s a reason why Congress and state legislatures impose personal liability on managers who do not protect employees from discrimination and harassment.   The fact is that nothing short of that worked to stop illegal treatment at work.

Perhaps, as Zappos believes, work is better conducted among equals, but the system needs to have a place where the buck stops in terms of fair treatment — and it can’t be put to a popular vote!