Zappos—a nationwide retailer—
adopted a new organizational structure that eliminates traditional managers, does away
with the typical corporate hierarchy and gets rid of job titles. (See
Washington Post @ Zappos Article) Could this end up being just like a high
school popularity poll?
Please
think about that for a minute. What will happen to the traditional manager’s
job of terminating poor performers? At Zappos that responsibility is turned
over to a group of employees. Their
committee is charged with “monitoring the company's culture” to decide when performers
are not a “good fit” — and then terminating those the committee deems as
culturally unfit.
Who is going to stand up for
the over 40 crowd who may not possess the youthful attributes of cultural fit? And who is going to stop sexual harassment? Historically
as well as today groups of employees don’t self-monitor all that well in preventing
hostile environments. (Think Miami Dolphins bullying episodes.)
There’s a reason why Congress
and state legislatures impose personal liability on managers who do not protect
employees from discrimination and harassment.
The fact is that nothing short of that worked to stop illegal treatment
at work.
Perhaps, as Zappos believes, work
is better conducted among equals, but the system needs to have a place where the
buck stops in terms of fair treatment — and it can’t be put to a popular vote!
No comments:
Post a Comment